Patrick Byrne
Politics • Science & Tech • Business
100% of this accounts proceeds do things to save our constitutional republic—your subscriptions & donations are greatly appreciated.

“We cannot achieve our goals if there are threats or acts of violence. This movement is a peaceful protest & we do not condone any acts of violence, etc. We know there will be activists working at the behest of global authoritarians & think tanks to sabotage our movement. Because of this, we must have a zero-tolerance approach to aggressive behaviour & violence.”
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Why I Love Rand Paul: This is what a well constructed argument looks like.

Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci Clash on NIH Funding in Wuhan: ‘It Is a Crime to Lie to Congress’

🚨ONLY 15 CENTS per day lets you see ALL posts, make your OWN posts, comment & reply! Subscribe or Give Once here ➡ https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/support ⬅ 100% from Locals, "The Deep Rig" book & movie are ALL being donated to The America Project which is funding the audits.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) grilled Dr. Anthony Fauci during a hearing on the Chinese coronavirus Tuesday over his prior claim that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has never funded gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Paul’s presentation triggered President Biden’s chief medical adviser, who refused to retract his May 11 statement and instead snapped at the Kentucky senator, brazenly telling Paul, “you do not know what you are talking about.”

“Dr. Fauci, as you are aware it is a crime to lie to Congress,” Paul began during the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions hearing Tuesday, reminding Fauci of his previous remarks to the committee on May 11th, during which the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director stated that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“And yet, gain-of-function research was done entirely in the Wuhan Institute … and was funded by the NIH,” Paul said, citing Wuhan Virology paper entitled, “Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses.”

“In this paper … she credits the NIH and lists the actual number of the grant that she was given by the NIH,” Paul said. “In this paper, she took two bat coronavirus genes, spiked genes, and combined them with a SARS-related backbone to create new viruses that are not found in nature.”

He continued:

These lab-created viruses within to shown to replicate in humans. These experiments combine genetic information from different coronaviruses that infect animals but not humans to create novel artificial viruses able to infect human cells. Viruses that in nature, only infect animals were manipulated in the Wuhan lab to gain the function of infecting humans. This research fits the definition of the research that the NIH said was subject to the pause in 2014 to 2017 — a pause in funding on gain of function. But the NIH failed to recognize this, defines in a way, and it never came under any scrutiny.

Paul also cited Dr. Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist from Rutgers, who described the research in Wuhan as matching the “definition of gain of function research done entirely in Wuhan for which there was supposed to be a federal pause.”

“Dr. Fauci knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11 where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan?” Paul asked:

But Fauci would not retract his statement and maintained that gain of function research did not occur.

“Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress and I do not retract that statement. This paper that you were referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain 0f function — let me finish!” he said as Paul interjected.

“You take an animal virus and you increase this transmissibility to humans, you’re saying that’s not gain of function?” Paul asked.

“Yeah that is correct, and Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. And I want to say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about,” he said as Paul interjected again.

“This is your definition that you guys wrote. It says that scientific research that increases the transmissibility among animals is gain of function. They took animal viruses that only occur in animals and they increase their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function?” Paul asked.

“It is not,” Fauci said as Paul continued.

“It’s a dance, and you’re dancing around this because you’re trying to obscure responsibility for four million people dying around the world from a pandemic,” Paul added.

In May, Fauci admitted the NIH funded the Wuhan lab but continued to deny gain of function research, defining it as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

“That categorically was not done,” Fauci claimed.

Paul has since said Fauci “lied to the American people.” Speaking on Real America’s Voice, Paul explained:

There was gain of function research going on with Dr. Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute.

In her paper, she actually thanked Dr. Fauci and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is a part of National Institutes of Health (NIH) that Dr. Fauci runs.

It’s listed at the end of the paper. This paper was fined by NIAID research, and it lists a ten-digit number that identifies the research money she got from the United States. Was it gain of function?

Well, it took a SARS virus, which is a coronavirus, that’s 15 times more deadly than COVID, and it added to it S protein, which is something in the surface of it, to make it more easily infectious to epithelial cells for the respiratory tract. That, to me, is gain of function.

On Monday, Paul called on Fauci to be “removed from a position of authority”: When I asked Dr. Fauci about GOF research funding to a Wuhan lab in May he repeatedly denied it. Yet, emails released under the Freedom of Information Act show he knew. He isn’t a trusted advisor & needs to be removed from a position of authority.

From breitbart.com/politics/2021/07/20/rand-paul-and-anthony-fauci-clash-on-nih-funding-in-wuhan-it-is-a-crime-to-lie-to-congress/

00:04:11
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
What Would Milton Do?

How Milton Friedman would fix our tax code and social safety net.

00:29:13
How the US Was Overthrown 2020-2024

I give a nice tight lecture on psyops and how the US was overthrown. I also give a (reluctant?) shout-out to the Christian community who gave us the footing from which to push back.

00:14:09
Debunking the 2020 Election Big Lie About "60 Judges"

Here is the link where you can find that in fact 93 cases were filed regarding Election 2020, 32 of them were decided on the merits, and 24 (75%) of them went for Trump / RNC.

https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm

Here is the Richard Feynman book I mentioned.

00:04:16
Associated Press Michelle Smith & I: Telephone Recording

For extra credit, and if the only alternative use of your next 33 minutes would be spraying your face with lighter fluid, setting it afire, and trying to put it out with a fork, you might prefer to listen to this additional recording of a telephone conversation between AP's Michelle Smith and me (recorded with her permission a few days after our Rochester encounter), to enrichen your experience of what it is like talking to an MSM journalist.

Associated Press Michelle Smith & I: Telephone Recording
🔥 FREE PODCAST: Gen. Michael Flynn There's one thing I learned in my political persecution. The truth will come out, and it IS coming out! If there's corruption, criminal activity, and malfeasance, the American people are going to be very unforgiving!

🚨 If you appreciate the updates, news, and videos, PLEASE "Give Once" with this link OR "Subscribe" for just 16 CENTS per day here ➡ https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/support ⬅ 100% of your gift/subscription is donated to The America Project. 🚨

"...if there's corruption, criminal activity, and malfeasance, to use your words, then the American people are not -- they're going to be very unforgiving," Flynn said. "So it's better to come out sooner than later, because if it comes out later, I'm afraid that the American people will take actions into their own hands."

He spoke as amid GOP-led audits of 2020 presidential election votes in Arizona's Maricopa County and in Georgia's Fulton County.

"What I'm trying to encourage is local action has a national impact. Get involved in your communities," Flynn said. "I'm seeing more and more people get involved at the local, township, parishes, and county levels. And American people are not – they're like a pit bull right now on this ...

🔥 FREE PODCAST: Gen. Michael Flynn There's one thing I learned in my political persecution. The truth will come out, and it IS coming out! If there's corruption, criminal activity, and malfeasance, the American people are going to be very unforgiving!
💥 There's a reason democrats are losing their toupees over trying to get the audit shut down.

The astounding level of corruption in elections is just the start. Patrick Byrne joins Tore for an interview covering his new book "The Deep Rig". Patrick also describes his activist organizations, Arizona audit news, the election fraud evidence, bamboo ballots, pitiful corrupt Dims, and physical intimidation from BLM and Antifa. There's more. The Plum Island move, public involvement fighting it, the free future of America, and real plans to get us there. These two great patriots agree the weeks ahead will be historic. This discussion provides hope that good prevails over evil, and the light of truth will soon shine through.

The Deep Rig - Tore Says Interviews Patrick Byrne

💥 There's a reason democrats are losing their toupees over trying to get the audit shut down.
"The Enemy Within" Watch it here (on Rumble)

General Flynn spent this year overseeing the making of this movie. there is a reason he did that. If you have not watched it, you are in for a treat.

3 episodes X 50 minutes/episode = 150 minutes

placeholder
Live chatted 11/11/2024
Let us Do an "Ask me Anything" at Noon Eastern

I've decided I would like to use this space more to interact with the really interested. Let's do an AMA starting two hours from now.

Look forward to seeing you there.

Announcement of How I am Going to Use Locals Going Forward

As you folks maybhave noticed, I have not been as active here as I was in years previously. The allure of reaching such large audiences on Twitter and Rumble seduced me. However, I have realized what I think the right formula will be going forward: I am going to post my explanatory videos on other platforms (along with Locals) in order to reach the masses. And then I am going to do much more frequent live AMA's on this platform, but limiting them to subscribers only (after a few minutes, anyway).

Thanks for sticking with me. It is going to be an exciting few months.

post photo preview
Covid-1984

George Orwell's prescient work 1984 foresees tyranny's need for propaganda that renders listeners incapable of critical thought, to the point that they cannot process what is in front of their eyes.

 

Fine illustration was given in the early minutes of the movie 1984, as we learn the daily routine of Winston (the protagonist). To a loudspeaker incessantly broadcasting statistics demonstrating Big Brother's progress in all areas of life, we witness their physical impoverishment (a colleague asking for a razor blade learns that Winston has been using the same blade for six weeks), as well as (through another colleague) Big Brother's assault on language as a way to control thought. We also witness the inability of the brainwashed to process the world they inhabit: the loudspeaker's lies about Big Brother's successes cheers up Parson while he works his way through a bowl of mush and meat-substitute. He is so indoctrinated he cannot process the reality in which he is sitting or even the food he is tasting.

 

Here is another situation that resembles this scene from 1984. Yesterday in the United States Senate, a British actuary presented the following information from the UK (which has excellent public health surveillance): getting vaccinated makes one somewhere between 26% and 145% more likely to die.

 

British data shows that all-in mortality is 26% to145% higher for vaccinated than non-vaccinated

 

Yet I know plenty of educated, normally sensible people, who cheerfully continue their defense of Big Brother's handling of Covid-19. They espouse their willingness to continue subjecting themselves to shots with all the alacrity of 1984's Parson, reciting statistics about Big Brother's successes while shoveling down gruel and meat-substitute with gusto.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals